Anumber written in expanded form is written has the sum of each blank write 39,005 in expanded form

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What number should be added to both sides of the equation to complete this square? x^2-10x=7

Paul’s car is 18 feet long. he is making a model of his car that is 1/6 the actual size. what is the length of the model?