Can some give me some rebex

where's the diagrams?

t = 3

step-by-step explanation:

put t = 3 in this expression :

(3²-1)(3²-2)(3² - 3)(3² - 4) = 8×7×6×5 = 56×30 = 1680

answers

\3. yes the presentation (i.e. odd numbers being written as differences of two squares) is possible for all odd natural number however the presentation may not be unique. for example,  57=112−82=292−28257=112−82=292−282.

\4. 2 can't be written as a difference of two squares because 4-1=3 and 1-1=0 and the difference of squares grows to integers larger that 3.

can i get some in proving questions 1 and 2?

vince wrote the sequence below.

1/3, 1, 5/3, 7/

which of the following explains whether the sequence is geometric?

the sequence is geometric because 2/3 was added to each term to get the next term.

the sequence is geometric because 3 was multiplied to each term to get the next term.

the sequence is not geometric because 2/3 was added to each term to get the next term.

the sequence is not geometric because 3 was multiplied to each term to get the next term.

step-by-step explanation: