Please answer ASAP! Determine which of the following relations is a function. A 2-column table with 5 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 10, negative 5, 0, 5, 10. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 10, 5, 0, negative 5, negative 10. A 2-column table with 5 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 3, negative 1, 0, 0, 3. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 2, 1, 2, 1, 4. A 2-column table with 5 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries negative 8, negative 2, 1, 2, 4. Column 2 is labeled y with entries negative 4, negative 2, 3, 4, 6. A 2-column table with 5 rows. Column 1 is labeled x with entries 0, 1, 2, 2, 5. Column 2 is labeled y with entries 2, 4, 2, 6, 7.

Browning labs is testing a new growth inhibitor for a certain type of bacteria. the bacteria naturally grows exponentially each hour at a rate of 6.2%. the researchers know that the inhibitor will make the growth rate of the bacteria less than or equal to its natural growth rate. the sample currently contains 100 bacteria. the container holding the sample can hold only 300 bacteria, after which the sample will no longer grow. however, the researchers are increasing the size of the container at a constant rate allowing the container to hold 100 more bacteria each hour. they would like to determine the possible number of bacteria in the container over time. create a system of inequalities to model the situation above, and use it to determine how many of the solutions are viable.

According to the 2008 u. s. census, california had a population of approximately 4 × 10^7 people and florida had a population of approximately 2 × 10^7 people. which of the following is true? a. the population of florida was approximately two times the population of california. b. the population of florida was approximately twenty times the population of california. c. the population of california was approximately twenty times the population of florida. d. the population of california was approximately two times the population of florida.

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.