Suppose that this is not a complete graph of a particular function. Instead, the function has a local minimum at x=-4. What might be true about the function? A. It could be 6th degree polynomial with a positive leading coefficient.

B. It could be 6th degree polynomial with a Negative leading coefficient.

C. It could be 7th degree polynomial with a positive leading coefficient.

D. It could be 7th degree polynomial with a Negative leading coefficient.

B. It could be 6th degree polynomial with a Negative leading coefficient.

Step-by-step explanation:

no oblique asymptote

step-by-step explanation:

to find the oblique asymptote of f(x)

here numerator has degree 1 and denomintor degree 2

degree of numerator < degree of denominator

hence there is no oblique asymptote

when the degree of the denominator > that of the numerator, we saw that the value in the denominator got so much bigger, so quickly,   giving us a horizontal asymptote of the x-axis. or we can write

f(x) = a polynomial of x + a proper fraction.

in this case only we have oblique asymptotes but not when numerator has less degree.

8(4)^8=72^feet to say that the total can conclude to 8(4) which as you know would mean 8 x 4. that equals 32w. 32^ could make a 72 answer as well. but your coefficent will remain w so your answer is 72w.

you!

if you need more with your math, visit khan academy where we give videos and tutorials   on everything math. we are efficent in our work.

you,

from,

the khan academy team