What is wrong with the following proof? Clearly we know that 1 does not equal 2. What rule of algebra did we break that makes this conclusion invalid? I've numbered the lines for you so you can refer to the line numbers in your explanation

Ineed with number 17 i don’t get it at alll

12. the amount of money in a bank account decreased by 21.5% over the last year. if the amount of money at the beginning of the year is represented by ‘n', write 3 equivalent expressions to represent the amount of money in the bank account after the decrease?

Which statements regarding efg are true? check all that apply.