the sequence the proves shape I is similar to shape ii when applied to shape I is reflection across y or x axis, followed by translation 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 units right and 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 units down, and then dilation by scale factor of 0.5 or 1 or 1.5 or 2

idk

step-by-step explanation: i just don't

find the magnitude of the trig term  

csc

(

x

)

−

1

by taking the absolute value of the coefficient.

1

find the lower bound of the range.

tap for more

y

=

−

2

find the upper bound of the range.

tap for more

y

=

0

the range is  

y

≤

−

2

or  

y

≥

0

.

(

−

∞

,

−

2

]

∪

[

0

,

∞

)

{

y

|

y

≤

−

2

,

y

≥

0

}

step-by-step explanation: