Alexa wants to use an indirect proof to prove that all rectangles are not squares. She first assumes that all rectangles are squares. Alexa then provides the following counterexample to
disprove her assumption.

She concludes that all rectangles must not be squares.
Which statement best describes Alexa's indirect proof?

A. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She made an error in her counterexample.

B. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She followed the steps of an indirect proof in the wrong order.

C. Alexa's proof is incorrect. She made an error in her assumption.

D. Alexa's proof is correct and contains no errors.

in the attachment.   i didn't see your choices.   the word which means there is choices.

step-by-step explanation:

(x,y)

x tells you how much left or right you go from the origin

y tells you how much down or up you go from the origin

so for example (-3,2), you go left 3 and up twice. i denoted which of the ordered pairs is which in my graph.

it’s the first one your welcome

answer:

step-by-step explanation:

here, the total dishes = 10

dishes having meat = 3 ( chicken, meatloaf and hamburger )

thus, the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes = number of dishes having meat / total dishes

=

therefore, the probability of not having meat = 1- the probability of having meat on the chosen dishes

=

=

=

⇒ option b is correct.