Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, samaragreen34
Ke’ajah has a coupon for 1/3 off the regular price, t, of a tent. which expression represents the price of the tent using the coupon? select the two correct expressions. a. 1/3t b. 2/3t c. t - 1/3 d. t - 2/3 e. t - 1/3t f. t - 2/3t
Answers: 1
15-(4m - 5) = 32 please help me...
Physics, 28.03.2020 07:11
Chemistry, 28.03.2020 07:11
History, 28.03.2020 07:12
History, 28.03.2020 07:12
Chemistry, 28.03.2020 07:12
Mathematics, 28.03.2020 07:12