A recurring customer has placed an order for loaves of bread of a specific size and color. The customer has received loaves of bread of a different size and color than that which was ordered. Why

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

For which of the following counts would a binomial probability model not be reasonable? a)the number of people in a classroom born in januaryb) the number of people in a classroom with red hair c) the number of people admitted to a hospital in a day with a particular disease d) the number of heart beats in a one-minute perio.

How many glue sticks are in a basket containing 96 scissors, if the ratio of glue sticks to scissors is 19 to 57.