A newsletter publisher believes that 61% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. A testing firm believes this is inaccurate and performs a test to dispute the publisher's claim. After performing a test at the 0.02 level of significance, the testing firm decides to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim? a. There is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance that the percentage is not 60%.
b. There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance that the percentage is not 60%.

step-by-step explanation:

the options are kind of confusing. i can tell you what i see going on here when i look at the graph.

the class and exam medians are closely related, and it looks like the low outlier on the exam did pull the median lower. [tex][/tex]

1. 3. can also be expressed as (22/7)

2. -4.5

3. 3.6

happy to

pls mark as brainliest

for a it would be 24 children.

for b i don't understand the question. is it saying for each individual person they pick 5 reds to 7 greens or is it the whole group. clarify and i hope this can you.

step-by-step explanation:

the answer is 8/21

hope this