Walter used the iterative process to determine that √13 is between 3.61 and 3.62. Analyze Walter's estimation. Is he correct? If not, what was his mistake?

Question options:

A. Yes, Walter is correct.

B. No 3.612 is less than 13.

C. No, both 3.612 and 3.622 are greater than

D. No, both 3.612 and 3.622 are less than 13

C. No, both 3.612 and 3.622 are greater than the square root of 13

Explanation:

13 is a prime number and must have a decimal number as its square root and so the square root should be between √9 and √16

Using the Newton Raphson method to estimate the square root of 13 with the formula: ai +1= ai²+n/2ai

We get square root of 13 = 3.6055512

This is the same result we get using a calculator to calculate square root of 13= 3.6055512

So yes Walter is not correct

yes he is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, Walter is correct.

No, 3.612 is less than 13.

No, both 3.612 and 3.622 are greater than 13.

No, both 3.612 and 3.622 are less than 13