The length of a rectangular wall is 16.5 feet. The height of the wall is 8.625 feet. Cameron determines the area of the wall to be 1423.125 square feet. Which best explains the reasonableness of Cameron’s solution? Cameron’s solution is reasonable because there are four decimal places in the factors and four decimal places in the product.
Cameron’s solution is reasonable because there are three decimal places in the factors and three decimal places in the product.
Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because 17 times 9 is 153, and 153 is not close to his product.
Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because 10 times 10 is 100, and 100 is not close to his product

Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because 17 times 9 is 153, and 153 is not close to his product.

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of a rectangle:

The area of a rectangle, of length l and height h, is given by:

The length of a rectangular wall is 16.5 feet. The height of the wall is 8.625 feet.

This means that

Estimate of the area:

To use an "easy" multiplication, lets consider . So

Cameron determines the area of the wall to be 1423.125 square feet.

Very far from the area of 153, which means that he made a confusion with the decimal places. Thus, the correct answer is:

Cameron’s solution is unreasonable because 17 times 9 is 153, and 153 is not close to his product.

answer

a,b, and d

explanation

a reflection angle is more than

but less than;

an angle that measures

is a reflex angle.(true)

an angle that measures less than

is acute.(true)

provided we are considering angles greater or equal to zero.

an acute angle lies in the range.

an obtuse angle is less than 180° but more than 90°

an angle that measures 300° is obtuse (false)

an angle that measures 65° is an acute angle.(true)

$9.41

step-by-step explanation: