Mathematics, 16.06.2021 16:30, jaygamer37

Anton defines an acute angle as an angle that is not obtuse. Is Anton's definition valid? A It is valid because all acute angles fit this definition.

B It is not valid because some angles that are not acute fit this definition.

C It is not valid because some acute angles do not fit this definition.

D It is valid because no obtuse angles fit this definition.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00, Tymere2011

Which measure is equivalent to 110 ml? 0.0110 l 0.110 l 1.10 l 11,000 l

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, kamilahmcneil3969

You are at a restaurant and owe $56.20 for your meal. you want to leave an 18% tip. approximately how much is your tip?

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:00, helen3327

You buy five cds at a sale for $5.95 each. write an expression for the total cost of the cds. then use the distributive property and mental math to evaluate the expression.

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00, dest8860

Which sum or difference identity would you use to verify that cos (180° - q) = -cos q? a.) sin (a -b) = sin a cos b – cos a sin b b.) cos (a -b) = cos a cos b – sin a sin b c.) cos (a -b) = cos a cosb + sin a sin b d.) sin (a + b) = sin a cos b + cos a sin b

Answers: 1

continue

Do you know the correct answer?

Anton defines an acute angle as an angle that is not obtuse. Is Anton's definition valid? A It is v...