Kaleb changed the subtraction in the expression to adding the additive inverse. What was his error? 6-17_-6+17
o Kaleb reversed the order of the integers.
Kaleb took the additive inverse of the second integer
Kaleb took the additive inverse of the first integer
Kaleb replaced subtraction with addition,

option 1 is correct.

step-by-step explanation:

y varies inversely with x and constant of variation is 4

the equation will be:

y = k/x

where k =4 so,

y = 4/x

if we put values of x of option 1 in the above equation and find values of y

y = 4/-2 => y =-2

y = 4/-1 => y = -4

y = 4/1 => y = 4

y = 4/2 => y =2

so, all the values of x and y are correct.

if we put values of x given in other options and find value of y we cannot find whole table satisfying the equation.

hence option 1 is correct.

6: 07 is your answer

step-by-step explanation: