What form of deductive reasoning is used in this argument? If a triangle is scalene, It has no sides the same length.
If a triangle has no sides the same length, then it isn't equilateral.
If a triangle is scalene, then it isn't equilateral.
Α. law of detachment
B. law of syllogism
C. law of contrapositive
D. law of converse
Ε. identification of counterexample

the answer i think is a)

step-by-step explanation:

85.560%

step-by-step explanation:

conditional probability is defined as:

p(a|b) = p(a∩b) / p(b)

in other words, the probability that a occurs, given that b has occurred = the probability that both a and b occur / the probability that b occurs.

in this example:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64 & turns 44) / p(turns 44).

if someone turns 64, they must have already turned 44, so:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64) / p(turns 44)

on page 42, we see that of the original 100,000, 94944 turn 44, and 81234 turn 64.   therefore:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 81234 / 94944

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 0.85560

18.8cm hope i at all

step-by-step explanation: