Mathematics, 01.06.2021 01:30, axonify
A manufacturer wants to inspect the absorption capacity of a new sponge. Based on past data, the average sponge could absorb 3.5 ounces. After the redesign, the absorption amounts of a sample of 10 sponges were (in ounces): 4.1, 3.7, 3.3, 3.5, 3.8, 3.9, 3.6, 3.8, 4.0, and 3.9. At a level of significance of 1%, would you claim that the new design is better than the old one?
Requried:
a. No because we don't reject the Null Hypothesis at Alpha = 0.01
b. Yes because we reject the Null hypothesis at Type 1 error = 1%
c. Yes because the cut-off is more than the sample mean
d. No because the cut-off is less than the sample mean
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, whitakers87
You are looking at two area rugs for your bedroom. one is a square with side lengths of 6.3 feet. the other is a rectangle that is 4.8 feet by 8.2 feet. which rug will cover the greatest area? how much more area will it cover? with work plzz and u so much
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:30, austinmiller3030
Maren is buying carpet for her rectangular living room. the room is 4.8 yards wide and 5.2 yards long. how much carpet does she need to buy? enter your answer as a decimal in the box. yd2
Answers: 1
A manufacturer wants to inspect the absorption capacity of a new sponge. Based on past data, the ave...
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:00
English, 06.01.2021 14:00
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:10
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:10
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:10
Physics, 06.01.2021 14:10
Mathematics, 06.01.2021 14:10