Robin, Steven, and John are comparing tree diagrams for rolling double sixes on two six-sided number cubes (6, 6). Robin thinks the probability is 136 based on the tree diagram they created. Steven disagrees and argues that the probability of rolling double sixes is 16. John counts twelve outcomes and claims the probability is 112.

Who correctly found the probability of rolling double sixes using the tree diagram?
A
Robin because there are 36 outcomes and only one is (6, 6).
B
Steven because there are 6 outcomes and only one is (6, 6).
C
Steven because there are 36 outcomes and six of them are (6, 6).
D
John because there are 6 outcomes for each and only one is (6, 6).

there is no grid

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v