What are the missing reasons in the two-column proof?

Reasons:

1. Because, MO cuts Angle PMN in two equal parts.

2.As ∠PMN is cut in to equal parts thus:

∠PMN = ∠NMO + ∠PMO, where these two parts (∠NMO, ∠PMO) are equal.

3. Both are the same, common you can say..

4. Because, MO cuts Angle PON in two equal parts.

5. As ∠PON is cut in to equal parts thus:

∠PON = ∠NOM + ∠POM, where these two parts (∠NOM , ∠POM) are equal.

6. From the above statements, we have:

= ∠NMO + ∠PMO (Proved)

= ∠NOM + ∠POM (Proved)

= MO = MO (Proved)

Thus, ∆PMO ≅ ∆NMO, by AAS rule

As simpoool as that!

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

step-by-step explanation:

given   that triangle lno is congruent to triangle lnm.

we have to fill up the blanks in the given question.

according to above order of congruency   kept in mind we can say that

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

ln ≅ ln due to common in both.

hence, by sas congruency,

the side angle side rule   states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to another triangle, then these two triangles are congruent.

17

step-by-step explanation: