Mathematics, 12.05.2021 22:20, duhfiywge8885

HELP I really need a good grade and I am lost. The study participants were divided into four groups—two groups received the Power Pill (Group A and Group B) and two groups received a placebo (Group C and Group D). The effects of the Power Pill were measured. One group that received the Power Pill (Group A) and one group that received the placebo (Group C) were told of the anticipated effects of the Power Pill—accelerated hair growth—while the other two groups (Group B and Group D) were not provided with this information. All four groups were told to monitor and report any physical changes during the study.

Results were reported and participants were grouped as to either “Saw Results,” meaning that participants reported increased hair growth as part of physical changes during the study, or “No Results,” meaning that increased hair growth was not mentioned as part of physical changes during study.

Results are as follows:

6 in Group A saw results.
7 in Group B saw results.
5 in Group C saw results.
4 in Group D saw results.
Part 1:

Create a two-way table for the data and find the probabilities for each group. Describe results in terms of the study.

Part 2:

What is the probability that a person saw results, given they received the Power Pill? What is the probability that a person saw results, given they received a placebo? Explain in terms of the study.

Part 3:

What is the probability that a person received the placebo, given that they did not see results? What is the probability that a person received the Power Pill, given that they did not see results? Explain in terms of the study.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Answers: 2

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00, taten1701

Simplify 15(x - 4)(x -1)-3(x + 4)(x - 1) with steps

Answers: 1

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, angelisabeast5430

Rectangle bcde is similar to rectangle vwxy. what is the length of side vy? a) 1 7 b) 2 7 c) 3 7 d) 4 7

Answers: 3

continue

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, leeshaaa17

Which expression demonstrates the use of the commutative property of addition in the first step of simplifying the expression (-1+i)+(21+5i)+0