One experiment had 10 players spinning, another experiment had 100 players spinning. Which experiment is more likely to come closer to matching its theoretical probability.

Experiment with 100 players sprinting

Step-by-step explanation:

When it comes to experiments using samples to find out the effect of a variable on an entire population by finding out the representative effect on the sample, the larger the size of the sample, the better.

A larger sample comes closer to being the actual size of the population so when this larger sample is experimented upon, the results it gives will be closer to the results that would be gotten if we experimented on the entire population. The 100 player sprinting experiment would therefore come closer to matching its theoretical probability.

d

step-by-step explanation:

by observation, we can see that the the graph is simply the graph of y = |x| that has been shifted 4 units downwards and 3 units to the left.

we can recognize in choice d :

y = | x + 3 |   - 4 (rewriting in general form)

y = | x - (- 3) |   - 4

the "-4 " term means   that the graph has been shifted by 4 units in the negative y direction

the "-3 " term means   that the graph has been shifted by 3 units in the negative x direction

this matches our observation of the graph described above.

i think the answer is fried chicken ; >

step-by-step explanation: