Choose 1 (Choice A) A Holden used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. (Choice B) B Holden only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion. (Choice C, Checked) C Holden established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion. (Choice D) D Holden used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

i can't see the picture : /

u bout ugly as   a mf

step-by-step explanation: lol

x ≥ 18 is your answer

step-by-step explanation:

let "a number" = x

(2/3)x + 17 ≥ 29

isolate the variable (x). do the opposite of pemdas (parenthesis, exponent (& root), multiplication, division, addition, subtraction).

first, subtract 17 from both sides.

(2/3)x + 17 (-17) ≥ 29 (-17)

(2/3)x ≥ 29 - 17

(2/3)x ≥ 12

next, multiply 3/2 to both sides to isolate the x

(3/2)(2/3)x ≥ 12(3/2)

x ≥ 12(3/2)

simplify. multiply, then divide

x ≥ (12 * 3)/2

x ≥ (36)/2

x ≥ 18

x ≥ 18 is your answer

~

step-by-step explanation:

step 1: solve one of the equations for one of the variables. let's solve the first equation for y:

step 2: substitute that equation into the other equation, and solve for x.

step 3: substitute x = 4 x = 4 x=4 into one of the original equations, and solve for y.