Mathematics
Mathematics, 27.04.2021 08:00, zoeatlowapple

A researcher is 95% confident that the interval from 3.6 hours to 8.1 hours captures μ = the true mean amount of daily screen time for US adults. Is there evidence that the true mean number of hours of screen time for US adults is greater than 3.5?

No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
No. There is not evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because there are values within the 95% confidence interval other than 3.5.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because 3.5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
Yes, there is evidence that the population mean is greater than 3.5, because the entire 95% confidence interval is greater than 3.5.

answer
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Jaylen52709
What are the values of m∠abc, m∠cbf, m∠abd and m∠dbe in the given figure? explain or show your work?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, amberosekemble8463
Ineed i do not understand i'm only 8
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:40, pum9roseslump
Evaluate the following expression 1/3^2
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30, sk9600930
Sundar used linear combination to solve the system of equations shown. he did so by multiplying the first equation by 5 and the second equation by another number to eliminate the y-terms. what number did sundar multiply the second equation by? 2x+9y=41 3x+5y=36
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
A researcher is 95% confident that the interval from 3.6 hours to 8.1 hours captures μ = the true me...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Biology, 27.03.2020 05:31
Konu
History, 27.03.2020 05:31