Mathematics
Mathematics, 08.11.2019 11:31, student8248

you conduct a thorough statistical analysis of the capabilities of three machines and conclude that machine number 3 is giving a consistently sub-standard performance. your recommendation is, due to the machine's age and the costs of repair, it should be replaced with new equipment. the line supervisor stated that there was no value in conducting an analysis to conclude what was already known to be fact. what can be stated about these two contrasting approaches? a. the statistical analysis validates the supervisors intuition.b. the supervisor is right, there was no need for a detailed analysis.c. neither conclusion is necessarily right, there is always room for error.d. more data may be needed to convince the supervisor

answer
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:02, mohamedramadan
Is a deceasing linear model or an exponential decay model likely to be a better fit for the data about remembering? ?
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 12:50, hargunk329
What aspects of lines have to be diffrent
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30, jakobrobinette
Is the square root of 4 plus the square root of 16 rational?
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:40, 721345
What is the the greatest common factor ?
Answers: 2
Do you know the correct answer?
you conduct a thorough statistical analysis of the capabilities of three machines and conclude that...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 21.03.2021 15:00