Based on your experiences so far, which approach to geometry do you prefer? why? which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions? what are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other? describe the situation and why you think analytical or euclidean geometry is more applicable.

Vikram is studying the square pyramid below. on st to find the surface area of the pyramid, in square inches, vikram wrote (33.2) (34 ikram wrote (33.2)(34.2)+43(34.2)(284) what error did vikram make? o he used the same expression for the area of all four lateral faces. he used the wrong expression to represent the area of the base of the pyramid. o he used the wrong value as the height when he found the area of the lateral faces. he used an expression for surface area that only finds the total area of three faces.