(tell me how to solve you dont need to awnser them all)

Step-by-step explanation:

A) having a blue first has a 1 out of 5 chance

   then lets say you got the 1/5, after that getting an X

   gives you a 1/3 probability, you can multiply then to find

   x and a blue probability is 1/5 * 1/3 meaning you have

   1/15 chance to get a blue x

O) there is 3/5 chance not to get red since there are 2 reds

   then again you have a 1/3 chance of getting an x

   giving you 3/5 * 1/3 meaning 1/5 chance to get

   not red and x

for prove you can write all possibilities

blue x, blue y, blue y

white x, white y, white y

white x, white y, white y

red x, red y, red y

red x, red y, red y

meaning 15 possible outcomes in which

blue y, white x or red x have 2/15 probability

red y or white y have a 4/15

leaving blue x with a 1/15 probability

you can apply the same rule with the rest

however if the question is something like probability of orange z, or anything not mentioned its automatically 0/ all possible outcomes, or if its like not orange and not z, its 15/15 then, how ever if its not orange and y its all the Ys meaning 10/15

you just have to understand the question

like lemme try question 2 , W

probability of not white is 3/4 scince there is only 1 white and other aren't and getting an odd is 3/6 or 1/2, multiplying them you get 3/8

all outcomes

w = white

nw = not white

nw1 , nw2 , nw3 , nw4 , nw5 , nw6             6

nw1 , nw2 , nw3 , nw4 , nw5 , nw6             6

nw1 , nw2 , nw3 , nw4 , nw5 , nw6             6

w1 , w2 , w3 , w4 , w5 , w6                           6 = 24

9/total outcomes = 9/24 or back to 3/8

the central idea is that:

individuals should refuse to cooperate with institutions they believe unjust.

thoreau felt  that governments were more often agents of corruption than justice, even democracies, and that just because the majority feels a certain way does not make it just or correct in absolute terms. he uses the fact that slavery exists in our democracy to support this idea.

he goes on to say that, as a result, people should live true to their own internal laws regarding right and wrong, as a product of reflection and a moral life, rather than following every law that society imposes. 

step-by-step explanation: