The ratio to boys to girls in ms. Johnson’s after school club is the same as the ratios of boys to Girls in Ms. greens after school club.

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Write the sentence as an equation. 6 fewer than the quantity 140 times j equals 104

Write a fraction less than 1, which has a denominator of 6 and is greater than 3/4 plz answer !