Pam finds the inverse of some linear functions. She notices a pattern when doing so. She makes the following claim: For any linear function y = cx + d such that y is a function of x, c#0, and d#0, its inverse function can be expressed
as y = x-d.
Part A
Determine a linear function in the form y = cx + d that supports Pam's claim. Enter your answer in the first
response box.
Part B
Determine a linear function in the form y = cx + d that refutes Pam's claim. Enter your answer in the second
response box.

if the eqn of the parabola is f(x) = (x-4)(x+2), we need to mult. this out to find the coordinates of the vertex.

then f(x) = x^2 + 2x - 4x - 8, and f(x) = x^2 - 2x - 8.

one way in which you can find the vertex is to calculate x = -b / (2a).   here, that comes to

        )

x = = 1.   f(1) = 1^2 - 2(1) - 8 = - 9.   vertex is at (1, -9).

        2(1) 

find another point on the curve:   let x=0, for which y=-8.   then (0, -8) is on the curve.   plot the vertex and this point and draw a smooth parabola thru both.

hope this

i love jeffery and believe there is truth in tati and james' answers

step-by-step explanation:

yes i have heard the tea

i believe both

no, tati didnt over exaggerate

james might might idk and tbh dont rly care

sorry not knowing about that