You discovered that if a pair of angles is a linear pair , then the angles are supplementary. Is the converse true? If so, explain why. If not, sketch a counterexample and explain why not.

The converse is true

Step-by-step explanation:

The converse of a statement is obtained by interchanging the conclusion for the hypothesis

The given statement is presented as follows;

If a pair of angles is linear, then the angles are supplementary

Therefore, the converse statement is;

If a pair of angles are supplementary, then the angles are a linear pair

A linear pair of angles angles are the adjacent angles formed by the intersection of two lines

Supplementary angles are two angles that sum up to 180° such that the angles sum is that of the angles forming a straight line

Therefore, the converse statement, 'If a pair of angles are supplementary, then the angles are a linear pair', is true

distance covered by pamela in 9 l of fuel = 99km

let us apply unitary method here.

distance covered by pamela in 1 l of fuel =99/9 =11 km

now let us find distance covered by pamela if she has 12 l of fuel.

distance covered in 12 l = distance covered in 1 l of fuel * 12

we know that distance covered by here in 1 l is 11 km.

so distance covered in 12 l of fuel = 11*12 = 132 km.

what's the question?

step-by-step explanation:

there is no question.