Answers: 3
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:50, danielzgame
The verbal translation for the difference of m and 7 increased by 15
Answers: 3
Perpendicular lines have opposite slopes....
Mathematics, 31.10.2020 01:00
Biology, 31.10.2020 01:00
Mathematics, 31.10.2020 01:00
Mathematics, 31.10.2020 01:00