In a particular roulette game, there's a 1/36 chance of winning. In a single day, a gambler plays 100 rounds and wins in 7 of them. You think the gambler may
be cheating. If you were to test this theory, what would be an acceptable null
hypothesis?
A. If the gambler is cheating, he'd win more than 1 out of every 36 rounds.
B. The P-value is .0217.
C. He's cheating, as evidenced by the P-value.
D. Everyone wins at their own game.
E. The gambler wins about 1 out of every 36 rounds; the wins are due to chance alone.

.19875994384

step-by-step explanation:

1699/ 8548

whole numbers.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given the average monthly rainfall (in millimeters) model r(m) for the years 1900-2009 as a function of the month number m.

as we can see m is taken for the number of months for years 1900-2009.

we know that number of months can't be a negative number or decimal number or a fraction.

so, the number of months could be only positive whole numbers.

therefore, whole numbers is more appropriate for the domain of r.

in english this is

ex.15 pag.85 create. write in ten lines the continuation of the ballad of the five motanasi, using verbs to the imperfect and to the perfect compound. five stars

hope i with whatever it is that you need! : )