Mathematics
Mathematics, 04.02.2021 14:00, emilyturchon

The graph below shows a transformation of the shaded rectangle onto the unshaded rectangle. On a coordinate plane, a shaded rectangle is larger than the unshaded rectangle. Keesha says the transformation is a translation, but Teagan says that the transformation is a dilation. Which statement about the transformation is true? Keesha is correct because the shaded rectangle is moved vertically to make the unshaded rectangle. Keesha is correct because the shaded rectangle is flipped across a horizontal line. Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is smaller than the shaded rectangle. Teagan is correct because the unshaded rectangle is turned in a clockwise direction.

answer
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:30, hjlhdjfhjh
What is the value of x in the figure below? if necessary, round your answer to the nearest tenth of a unit. 12 d 4 b оа. 3.1 ов. 6.9 ос. 4 od. 12
Answers: 2
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, carltonwashington23
The midpoints of the sides of the large square are joined to form a smaller square. what is the area of the smaller square
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:00, look26goingjbgy
Complete the conditional statement. if a + 2 < b + 3, then a < b b < a a – b < 1 a < b + 1
Answers: 3
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:40, Quidlord03
Which is the scale factor proportion for the enlargement shown?
Answers: 1
Do you know the correct answer?
The graph below shows a transformation of the shaded rectangle onto the unshaded rectangle. On a coo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
English, 18.02.2021 20:20
Konu
Mathematics, 18.02.2021 20:20