Use the rules of inference to prove the conclusion r given (all 1,2,3 and 4) the four premises listed below. Write your solution as a numbered sequence of statements. Identify each statement as either a premise, or a conclusion that follows according to a rule of inference from previous statements, or it is equivalent to a previous statement by the rules of logical equivalences. You should give the rule used by name and refer by number to the previous statement(s) that the rule was applied to. a. p +- (premise)
b. p Vu (premise)
c. q (premise)
d. ((r Λ t) V p) V-u (premise)

attached below

Step-by-step explanation:

Applying the rule of logical equivalences

attached below  is a detailed solution ( written as a numbered sequence of statements )

a) t'(-3, 6) and v'(0, 3)  

step-by-step explanation:

he used the algebra tiles correctly.

step-by-step explanation:

given : 3x(2x-1)

solution :

since he used algebra tiles .

armando's solution is the same in the solution shown in figure

as he distributed 2x into x and x and wrote them vertically

and also write   -1 vertically

and 3x into x and x and x and wrote it horizontally

performing the multiplication in the algebra tiles we get

and solving the given expression :

3x(2x-1)

since solving the expression using tiles   and solving the expression algebraically we get the same answer

thus   we can choose the first statement as the answer to this problem which is "he used the algebra tiles correctly".