80 points! Look at the pic attached. I will mark brainliest to the correct answer. Random answers will be reported :) thanks

No, it is not commutative. If used a square as an example, centered at (1,1). If a dilation is performed on the square of a scale factor of 3, and the square is translated 5 units downward, then the result would be different than if I switched the order, doing the translation downward first and then performing the dilation centered at (1,1).

I hope this helps! If you need any further clarification, just let me know below. Thanks! Have a good day, and good luck on your assignment. :)

this helps me :-))

thanks

he used the algebra tiles correctly.

step-by-step explanation:

given : 3x(2x-1)

solution :

since he used algebra tiles .

armando's solution is the same in the solution shown in figure

as he distributed 2x into x and x and wrote them vertically

and also write   -1 vertically

and 3x into x and x and x and wrote it horizontally

performing the multiplication in the algebra tiles we get

and solving the given expression :

3x(2x-1)

since solving the expression using tiles   and solving the expression algebraically we get the same answer

thus   we can choose the first statement as the answer to this problem which is "he used the algebra tiles correctly".