Is the relation shown below a function? Use the graph below to justify your response (0, 0), (2, 0), (2, 2), and (3, 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

By looking at the points (2, 0) and (2, 2),

The x-value of 2 gives the y-values 0 and 2.

Since this is a one-to-many relationship,

it is not a function.

No.

Step-by-step explanation:

No because the x-intercept repeat. If the y-intercept repeat it's ok, it would be a function, however if the x-intercept repeat the graph is NOT a function.

Ace Carlos

22

step-by-step explanation:

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet