introduces a study where researchers studying the relationship between honesty, age, and self-control conducted an experiment on 1G0 children between the ages of 5 and 15. The researchers asked each child to toss a fair coin in private and to record the outcome (white or black) on a paper sheet, and said they would only reward children who report white. Half the students were explicitly told not to cheat and the others were not given any explicit instructions. Differences were observed in the cheating rates in the instruction and no instruction groups, as well as some differences across children's characteristics within each group. (a) Identify the population of interest and the sample in this study. (b) Comment on whether or not the results of the study can be generalized to the population, and if the findings of the study can be used to establish causal relationships.

The solution to this question can be defined as follows:

Step-by-step explanation:

In choice a:

Both children between 5 and 15 years old and 160 years old are also the populations of interest, and Kids from 5 to 15 years of age.

In choice b:

These findings could be compared like we do not know whether the groups were randomly selected, and the allocation is still not random; there could be no casual conclusion because the statement is valid even With sample research, and after randomization, filtering, and testing of 160 specimens (instruction vs no-instruction) Its analysis can be common to the community and replicated. There could be explanatory relations generated by experimental research. This analysis is observational and can therefore be used Causal relationships are established.

a framing bias

step-by-step explanation:

rodrigo is subject to a framing bias i believe.

v,jhvljh,b.b; hk; ljujb,vuvccklokll; k,m,km,

step-by-step explanation: