Is there enough information to prove that the triangles are congruent? If yes, provide the correct Triangle Congruence Postulate or Theorem and a
congruence statement.
If no, justify your answer.
Please help!!!

Skill Tests

With a partner, complete the Skill Tests for the six areas of skill-related fitness and record both your scores and your partner’s scores below. Answer the reflection questions.

My Scores:

Agility – Agility Square Test:

Speed – Stay on Your Toes Test:

Reaction Time – Ready, Set, Go Test:

Balance – Stork Stance Test:

Coordination – Off the Wall Test:

Power – Standing Long Jump Test:

Partner Scores:

Agility – Agility Square Test:

Speed – Stay on Your Toes Test:

Reaction Time – Ready, Set, Go Test:

Balance – Stork Stance Test:

Coordination – Off the Wall Test:

Power – Standing Long Jump Test:

Compare your scores to your partner’s scores. Explain the reason for any differences.

How can improving your balance and coordination affect your performance in sports or recreational activities?

What activity was the most difficult for you to perform? Why?

Describe an activity that could help improve your striking and your reaction time skills.

Select a physical activity or sport that you have never done but would like to try one day. Identify at least one element of skill-related fitness that is important to being successful in this activity.

What power-increasing activities do you need to perform regularly to improve your performance?

Yeah, theorem triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

a function could be identified in 3 ways either on a chart,graph, or ordered pairs. first a function is that each point has its own. the rule is that there can be many x's to one y but there can not be 2 x's at different y's. so on a graph when you put a straight line through the y's there should be one dot only to be a function.

step-by-step explanation:

the results from a pre-test for students for the year 2000 and the year 2010 are illustrated in the box plot. what do these results tell us about how students performed on the 29 question pre-test for the two years?

if we compare only the lowest and highest scores between the two years, we might conclude that the students in 2010 did better than the students in 2010. this conclusion seems to follow since the lowest score of 8 in 2010 is greater in value than the lowest score of 6 in 2000. also, the highest score of 28 in 2010 is greater in value than the highest score of 27 in 2000.

but the box portion of the illustration gives us more detailed information. the middle bar in each box shows us that the median score of 20 in 2000 is greater in value than the median score of 17 in 2010. further, we note that the box and whiskers divide the illustration into four pieces. each of these four pieces represents the same portion of students. so, the upper half of the students in 2000 scored in the same score range as the upper one-fourth of the students in 2010, see the illustration at a score of 20.

by considering the upper one-fourth, upper half, and upper three-fourths instead of just the lowest and highest scores, we would conclude that the students as a whole did much better in 2000 than in 2010. we would conclude that as a whole the students in 2010 are less prepared than the students in 2000.

in this section, we discuss box-and-whisker plots and the five key values used in constructing a box-and-whisker plot. the key values are called a five-number summary, which consists of the minimum, first quartile, median, third quartile, and maximum.

step-by-step explanation: