The system shown is
inconsistent
equivalent
consistent

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Figure abcde is a regular pentagon. segment ae is located at a (2, 1) and e (4, 1). what is the perimeter of abcde? 4 units 6 units 8 units 10 units

In need of in the diagram, ∠abc is a right angle. ∠dbc = 30°27'40". find the measure of ∠abd.