Is trapezoid ABDC the result of a dilation of trapezoid MNPQ by a scale factor of Two-fifths? Why or why not? Yes, because AB and CD are each Two-fifths the lengths MN and QP. Yes, because sides AB and CD are parallel to sides MN and QP. No, because AB is Two-fifths the length MN but CD is One-third the length QP. No, because sides AB and CD have different slopes from sides MN and QP.

No, because AB is 2/5 the length MN but CD is 1/3 the length QP.

Step-by-step explanation:

Comparing the corresponding sides, the length of AB is 4. The length of MN is 10. This makes their ratio 4/10 = 2/5.

The length of CD is 2. The length of QP is 6. this makes their ratio 2/6 = 1/3.

The ratios of the sides are not the same, so the figure is not proportional and is therefore not a dilation.

C. No, because AB is Two-fifths the length MN but CD is One-third the length QP.

since your problem is x^4 = 81, what you have to undeo is the "to the fourth power" part.

the inverse (opposite operation) of "to the fourth power" is "to the fourth root".

  (x^4) ^ ¼   = 81 ^ ¼  

  81 = 3^4     so (3 ^ 4) ^ ¼   =   3 ^ 1   = 3

by hand: (3 ^ 4) ^ ¼   =   3 ^ (4 x ¼) = 3 ^ 1   = 3   (when you take a power to a power, multiply the exponents.)

or, do it by calculator. one way of finding the fourth root is to use ^ (1/4)

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

coldest temperature they recorded add me europa2433

europa2433