Mathematics, 01.12.2020 01:00, hbkakabryce0p3fkoq
It is given that ∠B ≅ ∠C. Assume AB and AC are not congruent. If AB > AC, then m∠C > m∠B by . If AC > AB, then m∠B > m∠C for the same reason. However, using the given statement and the definition of congruency, we know that m∠B = m∠C. Therefore, AB = AC and AB ≅ AC.
What is the missing reason in the proof?
converse of the triangle parts relationship theorem
substitution
definition of congruency
converse of the isosceles triangle theorem
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:20, kuehlthau03
Which is the equation of an ellipse with directrices at x = ±4 and foci at (2, 0) and (−2, 0)?
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, violetagamez2
Answer for 10 points show work you guys in advanced < 3
Answers: 1
It is given that ∠B ≅ ∠C. Assume AB and AC are not congruent. If AB > AC, then m∠C > m∠B by ....
Mathematics, 29.03.2021 23:20
Mathematics, 29.03.2021 23:20
Computers and Technology, 29.03.2021 23:20
Mathematics, 29.03.2021 23:20
Mathematics, 29.03.2021 23:20
Geography, 29.03.2021 23:20