Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = −2x? (4 points) A coordinate plane is shown. Points are graphed at 2 comma 4 and negative 1 comma 2. The points are joined by a line. a No, the points shown would not be part of y = −2x b No, proportions cannot be represented on a graph c Yes, all proportions can be shown on a graph of this line d Yes, the points shown on the line would be part of y = −2x

answer: the answer is (b) amie should have multiplied

step-by-step explanation: given a sphere and a cylinder with same radius and height.

let, 'r' be the radius of the cylinder and sphere and 'h' be the height of the cylinder. according to the question,

r = h.

now, the volume of the sphere will be

and the volume of the cylinder will be

therefore, we have

thus, ammie should have multiplied the volume of the sphere

image result for what is another name for consecutive interior angles? ​

when two lines are crossed by another line (called the transversal): the pairs of angles on one side of the transversal but inside the two lines are called consecutive interior angles. in this example, these are consecutive interior angles: d and f.

step-by-step explanation:

34

step-by-step explanation:

3

step-by-step explanation: