Kelly and Daniel wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT intersects line segment MR forming four angles. Angles 1 and 3 are vertical angles. Angles 2 and 4 are vertical

Kelly's Proof

StatementJustification
∠2 = ∠4Vertical angles are congruent.
∠1 = ∠3Vertical angles are congruent.
Vertical Angles are congruent. Vertical Angle Theorem
Daniel's Proof

StatementJustification
∠1 + ∠2 = 180°Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠4 = 180°Definition of Supplementary Angles
∠1 + ∠2 = ∠1 + ∠4Transitive Property of Equality
∠2 = ∠4Subtraction Property of Equality

water molecules will move from the side of higher water concentration to the side of lower concentration until both solutions are isotonic. at this point, equilibrium is reached. in an isotonic solution, the flow of water in and out of the cell is happening at the same rate.

hope this < 3

step-by-step explanation:

hjkj

step-by-step explanation:

ok one would be money, and the other would be refreshments or something similar. if each bag of popcorn is 5.00 and each drink is half of that that means drinks are 2.50 the proper way to do that would to look and see how much of each you can buy without exceeding a limit of 30.00