HELP ME PLEASE ASAP Why do all historical accounts, even history books, include some form of subjectivity when they are supposed to be objective?

a.) because they are written by people who have certain biases, and these creep into their writing
B.) because writers of history books want to express their own thoughts about the events
C.) because readers need to understand how the people who lived through the event felt and thought
D.) because objective writing is boring and dry and readers need some subjectivity to connect to the facts

I think its B (let me know If I'm wrong)

It has been learned that subjectivity and objectivity in history are related to each other. The reason behind is that the objectivities are the historians and scientific researchers who are responsible for exploring ancient structures that reveal past historical stories that happened from the past.

Please consider marking brainliest! :)

second option

step-by-step explanation:

the measures of a triangle equal 180. use that to find x.

2x+3x+4x=180

9x=180

9x/9=180/9

x=20

now you know x, you know angle a is 40°, angle b is 60°, angle c is 80°.

because angle a is 40°, the first option doesn't work.

because angle b is 60°, the second option does work.

when you add angle a and b, you get 100°. complementary means it equals 90°, so the third option doesn't work.

when you add angle a and c, you get 120°, which is not 100.