The anwsers are
A.(0,-1)
B.(-2,3)
C(-4,0)
D(0,-4)

  D.   (0, -4)

=========================================================

Explanation:

If you solve for y, you would get . The less than or equal to sign shows we shade below the solid boundary line.

Of the four answer choices mentioned, only (0,-4) is in the shaded region. So this is the only solution.

If we plugged the coordinates into the inequality, we get a true statement as shown below

This is a true statement because -16 is to the left of -8 on the number line. So -16 is smaller.

In contrast, if we tried something like (x,y) = (0,-1), then we see...

Which is not true because -4 is actually larger than -8. Use a number line to see this. So (0,-1) is not a solution. The same can be said about (-2,3) and (-4,0) also.

play black ops 4 answer a

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.