The Super Shop is having a Grand Opening Sale. Today's specials include 2 shirts for $25, 4 pairs of pants for $36, and 2 dresses for $44. The following question has two parts. First, answer Part A. Then, answer Part B. Several clothing items were sold during the Grand Opening Sale. A table of some shirt sales with missing data is shown. Number of Shirts Total Cost ($) 2 25.00 4 50.00 87.50 9 HURRY BECAUSE YALL NOT ANSWERING IT AND IMMA KEEP POSTING IT

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

F(n + 1) = f(n) – 8. if f(1) = 100, what is f(6)?

Valentina is subtracting from . she finds the lcd to be 15y2. what is valentina's next step?