Randy is checking to determine if the expressions 2 x + 2 + 4 x and 2 (3 x + 1) are equivalent. When x = 3, he correctly finds that both expressions have a value of 20. When x = 2, he correctly evaluates the first expression to find that 2 x + 2 + 4 x = 14. What is the value of the second expression when x = 2, and are the two expressions equivalent?
The value of the second expression is 7, so the expressions are not equivalent.
The value of the second expression is 12, so the expressions are not equivalent.
The value of the second expression is 14, so the expressions are equivalent.
The value of the second expression is 20, so the expressions are equivalent.

ur right ive taken the test

step-by-step explanation:

all three statements are true

step-by-step explanation:

a shipping fee of 5% is charged online with every item purchased online

first let's just take each option and calculate them based on this, to see if the answers matched

keith buys a 40 dollar book

40 x 0.05 = 2

therefore there will be a two dollar fee on keith's book

40 + 2 =42

the first statement is true

a chair costs $80

80 x 0.05 = 4

80 + 4 = 84

the second statement is true

george buys a 20 dollar calculator

20 x 0.05 = 1

20 + 1 = 21

the third statements are true

all three statements are true

answer:   the paragraph proof is mentioned below.

step-by-step explanation:

given: in a δxwy where

such that, ∠wzx ≅ ∠yzx and zw≅zy

we have to prove that: segment zx is a perpendicular bisector of segment wy.

prove: since, zw≅zy ⇒ ∠wzy is a supplementary angle.

then, ∠wzy= 180°

⇒∠wzx + ∠yzx = 180° ( because xz divides ∠wzy into two parts)

but, ∠wzx ≅ ∠yzx ( given)

⇒∠wzy+∠wzy=180° ( by substitution)

⇒2∠wzy=180°

⇒∠wzy=90°

⇒∠wzy=∠yzx =90°

therefore, xz⊥wy where wz=zy

⇒zx is a perpendicular bisector of wy.