Mathematics, 28.10.2020 01:50, fortwill05
6.5
Nadiya determines that there are no fractions equivalent to To with a denominator greater than 10, but less than 20,
that have a whole number numerator and denominator. Is Nadiya correct?
4
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the numerator and denominator by 2, the first fraction equivalent to To is 20
름
Yes, Nadiya is correct. By multiplying the whole fraction by any whole number, each equivalent fraction will
continue to have a denominator of 10.
O No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could multiply both the numerator and denominator of the unit fraction equivalent to
2
10 by 3 and arrive at the equivalent fraction 15
No, Nadiya is incorrect. She could add any number between 1 and 8 to the numerator and denominator and arrive
at an equivalent fraction with a denominator greater than 10 but less than 20.
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
Next
Submit
Answers: 3
Other questions on the subject: Mathematics
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:50, brea2006
An automobile assembly line operation has a scheduled mean completion time, μ, of 12 minutes. the standard deviation of completion times is 1.6 minutes. it is claimed that, under new management, the mean completion time has decreased. to test this claim, a random sample of 33 completion times under new management was taken. the sample had a mean of 11.2 minutes. assume that the population is normally distributed. can we support, at the 0.05 level of significance, the claim that the mean completion time has decreased under new management? assume that the standard deviation of completion times has not changed.
Answers: 3
Do you know the correct answer?
6.5
Nadiya determines that there are no fractions equivalent to To with a denominator greater than...
Questions in other subjects:
Physics, 27.06.2019 22:30
Mathematics, 27.06.2019 22:30
Computers and Technology, 27.06.2019 22:30
