randolph calculated the correlation coefficient to be 0 when counting bacteria growth over a period of 14 days. He concluded that there is no relationship between bacteria growth and time. Is Randolph correct? explain your reasoning

see attached

step-by-step explanation:

given the function as;

write the equation replacing f(x) with y

form   and fill a table containing values of y with corresponding values of x

you can take a range for   values of x as -3≤x≤3

solving for x=-3

for x=-2

repeat the same procedure to get the values of y for the remaining ,x=-1 to x=3

plot the values of y against values   of x and obtain the following graph

step by step solution :

step   1   :

1.1     4 = 22

(4)3 = (22)3 = 26

equation at the end of step   1   :

  ((23) • 26)2

step   2   :

equation at the end of step   2   :

  (23 • 26)2

step   3   :

final result :

  218

ya

you go to prefence in the settings and youll see a "i want to delete my account.

step-by-step explanation:

i would think "anyone would want the best for their child" is correct