What is -345 devided by 709

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Which equation shows y= 3 4 x− 5 2 in standard form? a 4x−3y=10 b 3x−4y=10 c 3x−4y=−10 d 4x−3y=−10

Mrs. sling bought a pound of green beans for $1.80. how much will mrs. tennison pay for 3 1/2 pounds of green beans?