Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04, Uc34758
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00, ismailear18
Anyone? 15m is what percent of 60m; 3m; 30m; 1.5 km?
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30, qveenvslayin
Erin bought christmas cards for $2 each to send to her family and friends. which variable is the dependent variable?
Answers: 1
Eight times the difference of a number and 4....
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 10:44
History, 31.01.2020 10:44
English, 31.01.2020 10:44
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 10:44
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 10:44
Physics, 31.01.2020 10:44
Mathematics, 31.01.2020 10:44