How do you graph y-2=2(x-2)

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

If a sprinkler waters 1 over 12 of a lawn in 1 over 2 hour, how much time will it take to water the entire lawn? (5 points) 10 hours 6 hours 1 over 6 hour 7 over 12 hour

The quotient of 15 and a number is 1 over 3 written as an equation